[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)
- To: fj@iesd.auc.dk
- Subject: Re: Familiy limit (was: About atomic encoding)
- From: alanje@cogs.susx.ac.uk (Alan Jeffrey)
- Date: Tue, 12 Apr 94 17:51 BST
- Cc: vieth@convex.rz.uni-duesseldorf.de, math-font-discuss@cogs.susx.ac.uk
>Unless I have misunderstood the problem, you can just use
>\DeclareSymbolFont with an existing math symbol font as the first
>argument.
Yes, you can overwrite existing alphabets quite easily, but that's a
slightly different problem. For example, you might have packages
`foo' and `baz', which together use 17 families. So you'd like to be
able to say:
\usepackage{undeclar}
\UndeclareMathAlphabet{\mathsf}
\usepackage{foo,baz}
If you just want to replace a math alphabet by hand, then
\DeclareSymbolFont does the right thing.
Alan.