texlua-based tool and restricted shell escape

Reinhard Kotucha reinhard.kotucha at gmx.de
Tue Feb 20 18:37:32 CET 2024


On 2024-02-20 at 15:45:30 +0000, Joseph Wright wrote:

 > On 20/02/2024 15:37, Reinhard Kotucha wrote:
 > > On 2024-02-20 at 13:09:37 +0000, Joseph Wright wrote:
 > >
 > >   > Hello all,
 > >   >
 > >   > In the notes for the upcoming TL'24 version of LuaTeX, it seems that lfs
 > >   > functions should be able to work safely in restricted shell escape mode.
 > >   > Is that a fair reading?
 > >   >
 > >   > The reason for asking is that the idea of listing files from within the
 > >   > TeX run came up (https://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/709934), and
 > >   > prompted me to look back at some L3 code that allows
 > >   > platform-independent queries for the file structures, but which needs
 > >   > unrestricted shell escape.
 > >   >
 > >   > David C. reminded me that texosquery is allowed in restricted shell
 > >   > escape mode, but it needs Java and is non-ideal. I was therefore
 > >   > wondering about putting together a Lua-based script that would do the
 > >   > same things, and thus would be easier to rely on. But that's only
 > >   > worthwhile if it can be used without needing unrestricted shell escape.
 > >
 > > Hello Joseph,
 > > maybe you can add the name of your script to the list of trusted
 > > programs.  They are listed in a variable called shell_escape_commands
 > > in texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf.
 >
 > Well yes, locally, but the question is whether this is viable at a
 > distribution level.

texlive/202*/texmf-dist/web2c/texmf.cnf *is* at distribution level.

Regards,
  Reinhard

--
------------------------------------------------------------------
Reinhard Kotucha                            Phone: +49-511-3373112
Marschnerstr. 25
D-30167 Hannover                    mailto:reinhard.kotucha at gmx.de
------------------------------------------------------------------



More information about the tex-live mailing list.